Market Analyses include: Unit Sales, ASPs, Market Value & Growth Trends
Market Drivers & Limiters for each chapter segment
Competitive Analysis for each chapter segment
Section on recent mergers & acquisitions
The biggest limiting factor for the MIS spinal device market is the complexity of the procedures and the skill required to master them. In particular, percutaneous techniques and, to a lesser extent, retractor techniques are considered by many to be considerably more difficult to master than traditional open surgical methods. Older generations of doctors and surgeons are especially reluctant to switch to MIS, as it takes a considerable time investment to master the procedure.
One of the key drivers for the MIS spinal device market is the increase in the target population. Both fusion and non-fusion procedures are typically performed in order to treat spinal complications that are much more common in elderly patients. Across Europe, the percentage of those over 50 years of age comprises approximately 34% of the total population. Over the next 20 years, this percentage is expected to increase by nearly 10%. The growth of this population is expected to stimulate growth in both fusion and non-fusion spinal implant markets.
The MIS interbody market continues to see a shift toward OLIF and LLIF devices and away from MIPLIF and MITLIF devices. The oblique and lateral lumbar approaches are expected to see more growth than their posterior and transforaminal lumbar counterparts, although positive growth is expected across segments.
Key Topics Covered:
Executive Summary U.S. Minimally Invasive Spinal Implant Market Overview Competitive Analysis Market Trends Market Developments Procedure Numbers Procedure Codes Investigated Markets Included Key Report Updates Version History
1. Research Methodology
2. U.S. Minimally Invasive Spinal Implant Market Overview 2.1 Introduction 2.1.1 Spinous Process Fixation 2.1.2 Facet Fixation 2.1.3 Minimally Invasive Interbody Fusion 126.96.36.199 Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion 188.8.131.52 Minimally Invasive Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion 184.108.40.206 Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion 2.1.4 Minimally Invasive Surgery Pedicle Screws 220.127.116.11 Percutaneous Mis Systems 18.104.22.168 Retractor-Based Mis Systems 2.1.5 Mis Sacroiliac Joint Fusion 2.2 Market Overview 2.3 Trend Analysis By Segment 2.4 Drivers and Limiters 2.4.1 Market Drivers 2.4.2 Market Limiters 2.5 Competitive Market Share Analysis
3. Procedure Numbers 3.1 Introduction 3.2 Procedures 3.2.1 Mis Interbody Device Procedures 22.214.171.124 Total Mis Interbody Device Levels Treated 126.96.36.199 Miplif Procedures 188.8.131.52 Mitlif Procedures 184.108.40.206 Llif Procedures 220.127.116.11 Olif Procedures 3.2.2 Mis Pedicle Screw Procedures 18.104.22.168 Total Mis Pedicle Screw Levels Treated 22.214.171.124 Percutaneous Cannulated Pedicle Screw Procedures 126.96.36.199 Retractor Cannulated Pedicle Screw Procedures 188.8.131.52 Retractor Non-Cannulated Pedicle Screw Procedures 3.2.3 Spinous Process Fixation Procedures 3.2.4 Facet Fixation Procedures 3.2.5 Mis Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Procedures 3.2.6 Spine Endoscope Procedures