TORONTO, July 30, 2012 /PRNewswire/ --
Duluth Metals Limited ("Duluth") (TSX: DM) (TSX:DM.U) today announces that the independent NI 43-101 Technical Report completed by AMEC E&C Services Inc. (AMEC) with a team led by Dr. Harry Parker entitled "Maturi, Birch Lake, and Spruce Road Cu-Ni-PGE Projects, Ely, Minnesota, USA, NI 43-101 Technical Report" with an effective date of June 15, 2012 has now been filed on Sedar (http://www.sedar.com). This filing follows the Duluth press release of June 13, 2012 which referenced the summary highlights of the new resource estimate.
Key outcomes as initially announced in the Duluth June 13, 2012 press release are:
- The Twin Metals Minnesota Project is amongst the world's largest Cu-Ni-PGM polymetallic sulphide deposits with contained metals (using a 0.3% Cu cut-off) of Indicated 8.0 Billion lbs copper, 2.5 Billion lbs nickel, and 12.1 Million ozs palladium+platinum+gold (TPM)and Inferred 13.5 Billion lbs copper, 4.6 Billion lbs nickel, and 15.8 Million ozs TPM .
- Using a base case 0.3% Cu cut-off, AMEC estimated Indicated Resource of 726 million tons and Inferred Resource of 1.37 billion tons on the three deposits (Birch Lake, Maturi and Spruce Road).
- The reported contained metal within the mineral resources is on only 11% of the property block.
- In addition to the stated Indicated and Inferred mineral resource tons, AMEC highlights additional Exploration Target areas surrounding Maturi estimating an additional potential of between 1.4 and 2.4 billion tons. These Exploration Target areas represent approximately 12% of the Twin Metals property block.
- Within the three zones for which resources are estimated, there exists significant continuous mineralization at higher grades than the global resource.
- The new study confirms this growing platinum group metals and gold resource within the Twin Metals Minnesota Project as one of the world`s larger palladium and platinum resources outside of South Africa.
This interim study will be updated in September 2012 with additional geologic and drilling data which will then complete the final Pre-Feasibility Resource Study. The final resource estimate will provide greater clarity on the continuity of higher grade mineralization, as well as upgrading additional tonnage from Inferred to Indicated.
Vern Baker, President of Duluth Metals, commenting on the report stated: "This Technical Report on the interim report mineral resource estimate provides the macro picture on this massive deposit. This report gives us the basis for developing a final prefeasibility geological model and estimate, as well as a foundation for the planning of the overall operation."
 Values for the Pt, Pd and Au components of TPM are shown on page 5.
 All tonnages are reported as short tons.
Details in the report are as follows:
The study Technical Report includes three deposits for which mineral resources have been estimated. These deposits are in close proximity to one another within the Twin Metals Minnesota Project, and are referred to as the Maturi, Birch Lake and Spruce Road Deposits:
- Using a base case 0.3% Cu cut-off, the Maturi Deposit** contains 726 million tons of Indicated Mineral Resources grading 0.55% copper, 0.17% nickel, 0.570 parts per million TPM (TPM = Pt + Pd + Au), plus an additional 651 million tons of Inferred Mineral Resources grading 0.53% copper, 0.18% nickel, 0.521 parts per million TPM.
- Using a base case 0.3% Cu cut-off, the Birch Lake Deposit** contains 242 million tons of Inferred Mineral Resources grading 0.52% copper, 0.16% nickel, 0.83 parts per million TPM (TPM = Pt + Pd + Au).
- Using a base case 0.3% Cu cut-off, the Spruce Road Deposit** contains 480 million tons of Inferred Mineral Resources grading 0.43% copper, 0.16% nickel.*
* Note - The Spruce Road resource was estimated using Inco legacy assay data. Platinum, palladium, and gold were not assayed by Inco, and the core is not available for re-assay.
** Note - These resource estimates include 100% of the identified material in each deposit, and include mineral resources acquired as a part of Twin Metals Minnesota's (TMM)'s acquisition of Franconia Minerals Corporation in 2011. Franconia's principal assets are a 70% interest in the Birch Lake, 'old' Maturi and Spruce Road deposits in northeastern Minnesota through the BirchLake Joint Venture. Franconia announced in November, 2010 its intention to increase its ownership at the BirchLake Joint Venture to 82%; see Franconia's company profile athttp://www.SEDAR.comfor Technical Reports. TMM's ownership of the resource will be factored by these percentages where applicable.
Contained metals in the new resources are as follows:
CONTAINED METALS IN THE TMM RESOURCE*
METAL INDICATED RESOURCE INFERRED RESOURCE Copper 8.0 Billion lbs. 13.5 Billion lbs. Nickel 2.5 Billion lbs. 4.6 Billion lbs. Platinum 3.2 Million ozs. 3.9 Million ozs.** Palladium 7.2 Million ozs. 9.7 Million ozs.** Gold 1.7 Million ozs. 2.2 Million ozs.**
* Note - Based on mineral resources estimated at base case 0.3% copper cut-off grade.
** Note - Contained ounces of platinum, palladium, and gold in the Inferred category do not include the Spruce Road deposit.
The AMEC work included an estimation of Exploration Target potential near the Maturi deposit. Three target areas were estimated: Maturi North, Maturi South and Maturi West. The location of the three Exploration Targets is shown in the map accompanying this press release. The estimated tonnage and grades of the Maturi North Exploration Target range from 450 to 690 M tons grading 0.44 to 0.52 %Cu, 0.16 to 0.18 %Ni, 0.08 to 0.12 ppm Pt, 0.21 to 0.29 ppm Pd and 0.05 to 0.07 ppm Au. The estimated tonnage and grades of the Maturi South Exploration Target range from 350 to 740 M tons grading 0.42 to 0.55 %Cu, 0.13 to 0.17 %Ni, 0.21 to 0.28 ppm Pt, 0.51 to 0.55 ppm Pd and 0.09 to 0.13 ppm Au. The estimated tonnage and grades of the Maturi West Exploration Target range from 600 to 980 M tons grading 0.41 to 0.52 %Cu, 0.15 to 0.18 %Ni, 0.10 to 0.13 ppm Pt, 0.26 to 0.32 ppm Pd and 0.06 to 0.08 ppm Au. The grade and tonnage ranges of the three Exploration Targets are based on limited drill hole results. The potential quantity and grade of the Exploration Targets is conceptual in nature, and there has been insufficient exploration to define the target as a mineral resource and it is uncertain if further exploration will result in the target being delineated as a mineral resource.
Twin Metals Minnesota LLC is the joint venture company between Duluth Metals Limited (60% ownership interest) and Antofagasta plc (40% ownership interest). In 2011, Twin Metals Minnesota LLC acquired Franconia Minerals Corporation. Franconia`s principal assets are a 70% interest in the Birch Lake, "old Maturi" (not including former Nokomis property) and Spruce Road deposits through the Birch Lake Joint Venture, with Beaver Bay Resources owning the remaining 30%. Franconia announced in November, 2010 its intention to increase its ownership at the Birch Lake Joint Venture to 82% upon commencement of production. All of the forgoing Indicated and Inferred Mineral Resources are expressed as a 100% ownership position. Exploration Target tonnages reflect TMM's current 70% interest in a portion of these properties, which will increase to 82% upon production.
The Mineral Resource Estimate discussed in the Technical Report incorporates assay data from 266 holes totalling 871,000 feet drilled on the Maturi deposit between 2006 and 2011, in addition to information from 99 legacy holes also in the geologic data base. The Birch Lake deposit resource estimate incorporates assay data from 65 holes totalling 155,000 feet drilled between 2000 and 2010, and information from an additional 14 legacy holes. The Spruce Road deposit resource estimate incorporates assay data from 210 legacy holes. The effective date of the mineral resource estimate is April 23, 2012.
The new Mineral Resource estimate represents an increase in tonnage and metal over what was used in Duluth Metal's Preliminary Economic Assessment (PEA) of January 8, 2009. The current Prefeasibility Study that is underway will review the scale, timing, and development of the Twin Metals Minnesota Project such that the information is appropriate to this latest estimate; additional modifications to some assumptions in the current Prefeasibility Study are likely when the results of the planned Fall 2012 update to the Mineral Resource estimates are available. The January 8, 2009 PEA report should be considered no longer relevant to the Twin Metals Minnesota Project.
A map showing the boundaries of the areas for which Indicated and Inferred Mineral Resources have been estimated and the Exploration Target Areas can be found as part of this press release, and is posted on the Company website at http://www.duluthmetals.com.
The Mineral Resource estimates in the Technical Report for the Maturi, Birch Lake and Spruce deposits are based on a 0.3% copper cut-off grade to define the resource model. Based on AMEC`s review of metal prices, process recoveries, refining costs and underground mine operating costs likely to apply at the Twin Metals site, the 0.3% copper cut-off grade (highlighted) is considered the base case for the statement of Indicated and Inferred Mineral Resources at this time.
The figures for resources presented herein, including the anticipated tonnages and grades that may be achieved or the indicated level of recovery that may be realized, are estimates and no assurances can be given as to their accuracy. Such estimates are, in large part, based on interpretations of geological data obtained from drill holes and other sampling techniques. Actual mineralization or favorable host rock units may be different from those predicted. It may also take many years from the initial phase of drilling before production is possible, and during that time the economic feasibility of exploiting a deposit may change.
The Company's business of mineral exploration has a high level of inherent risk. Although the Company is optimistic about the potential of many of its projects, there is no guarantee that any mineral deposits will be economically feasible and that these deposits will be put into production. The Company's exploration and development activities may also be affected by a number of risks, including environmental, metallurgical, financing, permitting, approval, legislative and other government risks which are normal to the industry and referenced in greater detail in the Company's Annual Information Form.
Tables of the updated resource tons and grades for various cut-offs are shown below. The estimates at the cut-off grades that are higher and lower than the base case are to show sensitivity of the estimate to cut-off grade. The Qualified Person for the estimates is Dr Harry Parker, RM SME, and the estimates have an effective date of 23 April 2012:
Maturi Deposit, Minnesota Indicated Mineral Resources[1,2] Cut-off Tons Cu Ni Au Pt Pd TPM Grade (Mt) % % ppm ppm ppm ppm 0.2% Cu 836 0.51 0.16 0.073 0.139 0.317 0.529 0.3% Cu 726 0.55 0.17 0.078 0.150 0.342 0.570 0.4% Cu 607 0.59 0.18 0.083 0.162 0.367 0.612 0.5% Cu 430 0.64 0.20 0.091 0.180 0.408 0.679 0.6% Cu 248 0.71 0.22 0.101 0.205 0.464 0.770 Inferred Mineral Resources[1,2] Cut-off Tons Cu Ni Au Pt Pd TPM Grade (Mt) % % ppm ppm ppm ppm 0.2% Cu 748 0.49 0.17 0.070 0.110 0.306 0.486 0.3% Cu 651 0.53 0.18 0.075 0.118 0.328 0.521 0.4% Cu 531 0.57 0.19 0.079 0.124 0.350 0.553 0.5% Cu 354 0.63 0.21 0.088 0.132 0.389 0.609 0.6% Cu 190 0.70 0.24 0.098 0.135 0.434 0.667
1. CIM Definition Standards (2010) were followed for Mineral Resource estimation and classification.
2. TPM is defined as Au + Pt + Pd.
Birch Lake Deposit, Minnesota Inferred Mineral Resources[1,2] Cut-off Tons Cu Ni Au Pt Pd TPM Grade (Mt) % % ppm ppm ppm ppm 0.2% Cu 346 0.44 0.14 0.09 0.18 0.39 0.66 0.3% Cu 242 0.52 0.16 0.11 0.23 0.49 0.83 0.4% Cu 196 0.57 0.17 0.13 0.26 0.55 0.94 0.5% Cu 141 0.61 0.18 0.14 0.28 0.60 1.02 0.6% Cu 65 0.68 0.20 0.16 0.32 0.68 1.16
1. CIM Definition Standards (2010) were followed for Mineral Resource estimation and classification.
2. TPM is defined as Au + Pt + Pd.
Spruce Road Deposit, Minnesota Inferred Mineral Resources Cut-off Tons Cu Ni Grade (Mt) % % 0.2% Cu 674 0.38 0.14 0.3% Cu 480 0.43 0.16 0.4% Cu 254 0.50 0.18 0.5% Cu 101 0.57 0.21 0.6% Cu 24 0.66 0.24
1. CIM Definition Standards (2010) were followed for Mineral Resource estimation and classification
For the non-legacy assay data utilized in these resource estimates, half core samples were prepared at ALS Minerals laboratories in Thunder Bay and then shipped to its analytical facilities in Vancouver. Samples were analyzed for Au, Pt, and Pd using a 30g standard fire assay with an ICP-AES finish and for 33 other elements using a four acid (near total) digestion and a combination of ICP-MS and ICP-AES. ICP over-limits for copper and nickel are re-analyzed using dissolution four acid (near total) digestion followed by ICP-AES or AAS. The remaining half core samples are being stored in Minnesota. A system of blanks, standards and quarter-core duplicates were added to the sample stream by Twin Metals Minnesota LLC to verify accuracy and precision of assay results, supplementing a variety of internal QA/QC tests performed by ALS Minerals.
All data verification and quality assurance/quality control procedures of Twin Metals Minnesota LLC were applied specifically to the results contained in this press release, and the data herein has been verified by Phillip Larson, P. Geo., Senior Geologist with Duluth Metals and a Qualified Person under NI 43-101, in accordance with the procedures of the Company. The data verification procedures and quality assurance/control procedures adopted by the Company and applied to the work being reported in this press release can be found in Section 14 of the "Technical Report On The Mineral Resource Estimate For The Nokomis Deposit On The Nokomis Property, Minnesota, U.S.A.", with an effective date of October 26, 2009, and dated December 10, 2009. The Technical Report was filed on SEDAR under the Company's profile on December 11, 2009 (http://www.sedar.com).
Dr. Harry Parker, SME, Registered Member, Technical Director of AMEC, is the Independent Qualified Person who prepared the Mineral Resource Estimate. Dr. Parker is also a licensed Professional Geologist in the State of Minnesota. Phillip Larson, P. Geo. is the Qualified Person for Duluth Metals and Senior Geologist for Duluth Metals, in accordance with NI 43-101 of the Canadian Securities Administrators, and reviewed and approved the technical content of this press release.
About Duluth Metals Limited
Duluth Metals Limited is committed to acquiring, exploring and developing copper, nickel and platinum group metal (PGM) deposits. Duluth Metals has a joint venture with Antofagasta plc on the Twin Metals Project, located within the rapidly emerging Duluth Complex mining camp in north-eastern Minnesota. The Duluth Complex hosts one of the world's largest undeveloped repositories of copper, nickel and PGMs, including the world's third largest accumulation of nickel sulphides, and one of the world's largest accumulations of polymetallic copper and platinum group metals. Aside from the joint venture, Duluth Metals retains a 100% position on approximately 40,000 acres of mineral interests on exploration properties adjacent to and nearby the Twin Metals Minnesota LLC joint venture.
About Twin Metals Minnesota LLC
Twin Metals Minnesota, LLC is a joint venture company, 60 percent owned by Duluth Metals Limited and 40 percent by Antofagasta plc. Twin Metals was formed in 2010 to pursue the development and operation of a copper, nickel and platinum group metals (strategic metals) underground mining project within the Duluth Complex in northeastern Minnesota. Twin Metals holds mineral and land assets of approximately 32,000 acres of leased and permitted land, including mineral resources prepared in compliance with the requirements of NI 43-101.
This press release contains forward-looking statements (including "forward-looking information" within the meaning of applicable Canadian securities legislation and "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of the US Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995) relating to, among other things, the results of drilling operations and exploration and mine development. Generally, forward-looking statements can be identified by the use of words such as "plans", "expects" or "does not expect", "is expected", "budget", "scheduled", "estimates", "forecasts", "intends", "anticipates" or "does not anticipate", or "believes", or variations of such words and phrases or statements that certain actions, events or results "may", "could", "would", "might" or "will be taken", "occur" or "be achieved". Duluth Metals has relied on a number of assumptions and estimates in making such forward-looking statements, including, without limitation, the prices of copper, nickel and platinum group metals (PGMs) and the costs associated with continuing exploration and mining development. Such assumptions and estimates are made in light of the trends and conditions that are considered to be relevant and reasonable based on information available and the circumstances existing at this time. A number of risk factors may cause actual results, level of activity, performance or outcomes of such exploration and/or mine development to be materially different from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements including, without limitation, whether such discoveries will result in commercially viable quantities of such mineralized materials, the possibility of changes to project parameters as plans continue to be refined, the ability to execute planned exploration and future drilling programs, possible variations of copper, nickel and PGM grade or recovery rates, the need for additional funding to continue exploration efforts, changes in general economic, market and business conditions, and those other risks set forth in Duluth Metals' most recent annual information form under the heading "Risk Factors" and in its other public filings. Statements related to "reserves" and "resources" are deemed forward-looking statements as they involve the implied assessment, based on realistically assumed and justifiable technical and economic conditions, that an inventory of mineralization will become economically extractable. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and such information is inherently subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that are difficult to predict and may be beyond the control of Duluth Metals. Although Duluth Metals has attempted to identify important risks and factors that could cause actual actions, events or results to differ materially from those described in forward-looking statements, there may be other factors and risks that cause actions, events or results not to be as anticipated, estimated or intended. Consequently, undue reliance should not be placed on such forward-looking statements. In addition, all forward-looking statements in this press release are given as of the date hereof. Duluth Metals disclaims any intention or obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, save and except as may be required by applicable securities laws. The forward-looking statements contained herein are expressly qualified by this disclaimer.
Cautionary Note to United States Investors Concerning Estimates of Indicated and Inferred Mineral Resources
This press release uses the terms "Indicated Mineral Resources" and "Inferred Mineral Resources" in accordance with the Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum (CIM) Definition Standards. While such terms are recognized under Canadian securities legislation, the United States Securities and Exchange Commission does not recognize these terms. The term "Inferred Mineral Resource" refers to a mineral resource for which quantity and grade or quality can be estimated on the basis of geological evidence and limited sampling and reasonably assumed, but not verified, geological and grade continuity. These estimates are based on limited information and it cannot be assumed that all or any part of an "Inferred Mineral Resource" will be upgraded to a higher classification resource, such as "Indicated" or "Measured", as a result of continued exploration. Accordingly, an estimate relating to an "Inferred Mineral Resource" is insufficient to allow meaningful application of technical and economic parameters or to enable an evaluation of economic viability. Under Canadian securities legislation, estimates of an "Inferred Mineral Resource" may not form the basis of feasibility or other economic studies. Investors are cautioned not to assume that all or any part of an "Inferred Mineral Resource" is economically or legally mineable. Investors are also cautioned not to assume that all or any part of "Indicated" will ever be converted into "Mineral Reserves" (being the economically mineable part of an "Indicated" or "Measured Mineral Resource").
For further information:
Director of Corporate Communications
Telephone: +1-416-369-1500 ext. 222
Telephone: +1-651- 389-9990